Advanced Search

Motorcyclist awarded damages for serious injuries after accident with a truck and a car

Accident Type: 
Motorcycle Accident
Incident Date: 
Wednesday, May 28, 2008
Result Date: 
Friday, July 9, 2010
Monetary Result: 
$1,162,022
On May 28, 2008 Eddie Trujillo was operating his motorcycle south in the high occupancy vehicle lane on Interstate 405 in Bellevue, WA. At the same time, Martin Vasquez was driving a 1999 Century Freightliner Truck owned by his employer Esparza Truck Inc. in the fast lane adjacent to Trujillo. Vasquez then collided with a Kia to his right operated by Dakoda Rooney. The impact of the collision resulted in the Kia to spinning out of control. Vasquez then broadsided the Kia a second time, propelling it into Trujillo's lane. His motorcycle then crashed into Rooney’s Kia. Trujillo’s motorcycle was totaled in the collision. Vasquez was cited for an unsafe lane change, failure to keep right, and defective brake adjustment. Trujillo claimed he sustained a flail chest, fractured clavicle, post-­traumatic stress disorder, and brain injury as a result of the collision. Trujillo and his wife, Yolanda Trujillo, filed a vehicle negligence lawsuit against Esparza Truck, Vasquez and his wife, Constantina Mandujano, and Rooney and her husband, Bryant Rooney in the King County Superior Court. In their first amended complaint, the plaintiff alleged Vasquez and Dakoda caused the accident by negligently changing lanes. The Trujillos claimed Vasquez was negligent because he failed to drive his truck in the right hand lane. The Trujillos claimed Vasquez acted within the scope of his employment, rendering Esparza Truck liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior. The plaintiffs sought damages for Eddie’s injuries, almost $50,000 in medical expenses, pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, over $440,000 in lost wages and employment benefits, impairment of earning capacity, transportation expenses, housekeeping expenses, and over $7,200 in property damage. Yolanda also sought damages for loss of Eddie’s consortium. The Rooneys denied the allegations of negligence and claimed the plaintiffs’ own negligence, failure to mitigate their damages, and the negligence of Esparza Truck and Vasquez, as defenses. The defendants sought entitlement to indemnity and contribution from Esparza Truck and Vasquez. They also questioned the nature and extent of the plaintiffs’ claimed injuries and damages. The Rooneys filed a cross­claim against Esparza Truck and Vasquez, allegating that Vasquez’s negligence resulted in the incident. They sought damages for Dakoda’s injuries, medical expenses, and property damage. Esparza Truck and Vasquez denied the allegations of negligence and asserted the plaintiffs’ failure to mitigate their damages as an affirmative defense. They claimed Vasquez was driving in his lane of travel and did not attempt to change lanes at the time of the accident. The defendants also disputed the nature and extent of the plaintiffs’ claimed injuries and damages. Esparza Truck and Vasquez filed a cross­claim against the Rooneys, alleging Dakoda’s negligence proximately caused the incident. Esparza Truck and Vasquez reportedly accepted liability and agreed to settle the Rooneys’ cross­claim against them. The court granted the plaintiffs’ partial motions for summary judgment finding Eddie fault free and the negligence of either or both Vasquez and Dakoda caused the collision. The plaintiffs were awarded $49,946.56 in medical expenses. The defendants’ affirmative defenses were also dismissed. Jurors returned a verdict July 9, 2010, finding Esparza Truck and Vasquez were negligent and their negligence was a proximate cause of the injury and damages to the plaintiffs. The panel determined Dakoda was not negligent. Eddie was awarded $1,080,772 and Yolanda was awarded $81,250. Judge Carol Schapira entered judgment in accordance with the verdict July 29. Judge Schapira ordered Esparza Truck, Vasquez, and Mandujano to pay $556.78 for attorney fees and court costs.

Motorcyclist awarded damages after hitting a car that failed to yield

Accident Type: 
Motorcycle Accident
Incident Date: 
Thursday, December 14, 2006
Result Date: 
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
Monetary Result: 
$1,156,640
On Nov. 14, 2006, plaintiff Carlos Llamas, 34, a substitute teacher, was driving a motorcycle east on Lugonia Avenue in Redlands, on his way home from school. The plaintiff crashed into a vehicle operated by Thomas Chung, who was coming from the opposite direction and was making a left turn into his driveway. Llamas’s motorcycle hit the front of Chung’s car, and he was thrown approximately 150 feet. An ambulance sent Llamas to an emergency room with a fracture to his left, non-­dominant forearm. He underwent several surgeries, including open reduction-­internal fixation with plating and skin grafting from his thigh. He also sustained a torn anterior cruciate ligament in his left knee for which he received arthroscopic surgery. Llamas also sustained lacerations to his bowel and colon, leading to a partial removal of both, and the insertion of a colostomy. Llamas sued Chung for motor vehicle negligence. He claimed that Chung failed to yield to his oncoming motorcycle, which was going straight on Lugonia, as opposed to the defendant’s left-­turning vehicle. Llamas claimed that he tried to avoid hitting Chung’s vehicle, but couldn’t, and collided with the car’s front end. Chung contended that Llamas was speeding, and presented two eyewitnesses who stated that the plaintiff was driving between 70 mph and 80 mph in a zone where the speed limit was 50 mph. Chung claimed that, had Llamas been going slower, the accident could have been avoided because the plaintiff would have had enough distance to stop before the crash. The plaintiff had a successful takedown of the colostomy after seven months and had no residual intestinal problems. He claimed residual weakness in his left arm with permanent disfigurement. He also claimed that he’d require future surgery on his injured left knee. Llamas missed 1.5 years of work after the accident, but by trial he had returned to an active, working lifestyle. He sought damages for past and future pain and suffering, past and future medical costs and past lost earnings. The defense contended that the plaintiff’s knee injury was the result of a pre­-existing condition relating to a compound fracture he had sustained in a car accident two years prior to the subject accident. Chung did not contest the cause or severity of the plaintiff’s arm and intestinal injuries. The jury found that Chung was 75­-percent liable and Llamas was 25-­percent at fault. Thus the damages awarded to Llamas were reduced to $867,480.      

One clients story of how this Bellingham, WA lawyer helped him recover after a car accident

If you have been injured in a car accident that wasn't your fault, it can help to hear that you're not alone. That you do have options, and there are ways to recover some of what you lost financially. It takes money to be able to recover from serious injuries including bone fractures, like this car accident victim hit by a distracted driver. Sometimes your best option is to seek legal expertise to make sure you receive a fair settlement for your damages and losses. Here is one client's story.

Catastrophic car accidents and wrongful death - what survivors need to know

Bill Coats Law specializes in wrongful death cases in devastating car accidents. With empathy and grit, our lawyers walk survivors through the complicated process of financial recovery. Click here for this guide to basic questions answered about damages recoverable in wrongful death cases. 

Motor vehicle accidents are a common occurrence in Las Vegas and across Clark County, Nevada. With a huge influx daily of visitors from across the world, many crashes are caused by drivers who are unfamiliar with Vegas freeways and roads. Many are caused by drunk drivers or distracted drivers taking in the sights. Whatever the cause, car accidents are a major safety and economic issue for the Las Vegas community.